User talk:Zxcvbnm

Your draft article, Draft:Penny Arcade's On the Rain-Slick Precipice of Darkness 3 and 4

Hello, Zxcvbnm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Penny Arcade's On the Rain-Slick Precipice of Darkness 3 and 4".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Durrr Burger second look

Hello Zxcvbnm, I hope you are well. I recently added new sources detailing more real-world impact of Draft:Durrr Burger, and I was wondering if you could take a look? I believe there's now significant enough commentary made about Durrr Burger as a character from CNBC, Dot Esports, GamesRadar+, and additional real-world impact described by PCGamesN, Eurogamer, GameRevolution, The Verge, and others to pass both GNG and SIGCOV at this point. While the nature of the page is really silly (its a burger with a face) I really want to fight for it and all the work I put into making it. If possible, I would appreciate your support on its reintroduction to the main space Zxcvbnm, but let me know what you think 🙂 Johnson524 15:22, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

It would probably be faster if you just posted here the links to whatever new source(es) you believe demonstrate SIGCOV that were not previously mentioned and how much coverage it gets in each source. Otherwise I have to check back and forth about all the sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:38, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

More sources for Space Station Simulator

Hi! :) I found more sources for Space Station Simulator you can use

• https://www.newspapers.com/article/dorset-echo/170444355/
• https://www.newspapers.com/article/staines-and-egham-news/170444468/
• https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-independent/170444493/
• https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-daily-telegraph/170444551/

BTW the game released in 1997 not 1998 (MobyGames editors got the date wrong) since reviews for this game existed as early as March 1997. Timur9008 (talk) 16:48, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

@Timur9008: I added them to the talk page. If I ever feel like expanding it more, I will take a look. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:51, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Pokémon species

I've honestly been iffy on Galarian Corsola for a while now, since I made it during my earlier days of article creation. I'm letting the discussion run its course since I'm admittedly not too sure on it myself, but I figured it'd be valuable to get your input on this: Are there any other species articles you feel aren't up to snuff notability-wise right now? You tend to be more strict with notability than most, so I figured your thoughts would be helpful in determining what species may be lacking, or may need more done for them. Obviously this is a big ask, so if you don't want to, I'm not forcing you, but I'd greatly appreciate even simple comments on the matter, as someone who's trying to expand the quality content in the Pokémon WikiProject. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 00:52, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

@Pokelego999: Mawile in particular is making me very heavily skeptical of its notability. Its claim to passing GNG is rather weak, and it suffers the same problems as Galarian Corsola - WP:REFBOMBing and most coverage being trivial in nature. I am also very skeptical on Gardevoir for the same reasons. And yes it's quite a long article, but REFBOMBing does not really matter when it comes to GNG, only solid sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 01:15, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

I'll see if I can take another look for those, especially Gardevoir. Thank you so much for your input! Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 22 § Mythological stuff to legendary stuff

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 22 § Mythological stuff to legendary stuff on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 03:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)